Mexico ranks 8th on the list (Source: CCC) |
An index looking at the ability of Latin American
countries to combat corruption has highlighted that signs of progress are still
few and far between, and the region as a whole is backsliding.
The 2020 Capacity to Combat Corruption
(CCC) Index found that, in 2019, many countries in the region have moved away
from anti-corruption measures. And the timing could not be worse, since
corruption and graft have held back Latin America’s pandemic response in myriad
ways.
To measure the degree of impunity in each
country, the report — put together annually by the Americas Society and Council
of the Americas‘ (AS/COA) Anti-Corruption Working Group and Control Risks —
examined legal capacity, political institutions and civil society responses.
Below, InSight Crime takes a look at how the countries compare — from above
average to worryingly poor.
1. Above Average: Uruguay, Chile, Costa
Rica
Uruguay outperformed all 15 other
countries in the region, thanks to the efficiency and independence of its
courts, law enforcement agencies and anti-corruption bodies. Since 2018, the
country’s congress has also taken on money laundering, a key remaining cause
for concern.
Chile, which is often one of the top
performers in the index, came in second despite seeing political unrest in
2019. Still, the country’s demonstrations delivered the biggest hit to Chile’s
score, as anti-corruption priorities gave way to issues of healthcare and
gender equality. Chile’s plans to draft a new constitution will determine how
the country deals with corruption going forward, the report said.
2. Progress Needed: Brazil, Peru,
Argentina, Colombia
This group contains both the biggest
year-over-year loser and winner: Brazil and Peru, respectively. Colombia and
Argentina, meanwhile, saw almost no changes in their scores during 2019.
Although Brazil ranks fourth on the index
overall, its score dropped 10 percent from last year, and the country “displays
one of the most concerning trajectories in the region,” the report stated. The
index points to President Jair Bolsonaro’s interference with law enforcement
agencies and questions raised in the landmark Lava Jato case, a wide-reaching
corruption investigation that uncovered companies — chief among them the
Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht — had laundered money to pay bribes and
kickbacks for inflated public works contracts. The investigation has led to
charges against lawmakers, business tycoons and even presidents.
Chats leaked to The Intercept, however,
showed a high-profile Brazilian judge in the case, Sergio Moro, provided tips
to prosecutors on investigative lines, a collaboration which is legally
prohibited and a serious ethical violation. The report also highlights
investigations into Bolsonaro’s sons – one for corruption and ties to militia
groups in Rio de Janeiro, and another for being a key member of a criminal fake
news racket.
On the other hand, the Index calls Peru
its most positive story of 2020, citing the country’s clear improvements in law
enforcement capacity and court system, and the prominence of anti-corruption
efforts in President Martín Vizcarra’s agenda. InSight Crime reported on
Vizcarra’s rough start with anti-corruption reform in early 2019, but the
creation of a new, powerful agency that targets judges and public officials
accused of corruption (National Justice Junta – JNJ), progress on the Lava Jato
investigation and improvements in campaign financing have paid off, according
to the report. Reforms to parliamentary immunity and campaigning are the events
to watch.
3. Below Average: Mexico, Ecuador, Panama
This group is characterized by countries
with strong anti-corruption rhetoric but questionable action on the ground.
Panama’s new administration, for instance, came to power on the back of public
demand for anti-corruption reform. But once President Laurentino Cortizo took
office, his agenda struggled to find traction in congress, even from members of
his own party, the report found. Panama continues to be a country of concern
for money laundering and financial secrecy.
In Mexico, civil society has been calling
for reform for years and President Andrés Manuel López Obrador came to power in
2018 with a promise of ending corruption. Yet in practice, Mexico has stagnated
as shown by the never-ending list of allegations against its former police,
political class and even sports teams. The index criticizes the president’s
focus on his personal ability to find and stop corruption, rather than empower
institutions such as the National Anti-corruption System (Sistema Nacional
Anticorrupción – SNA) and the Financial Intelligence Agency (Unidad de
Inteligencia Financiera – UIF). It also cites concerns that the UIF isn’t truly
independent from the president.
4. Poor Performers: Guatemala, Paraguay,
Dominican Republic and Bolivia
Civil society has attempted to compensate
for weak legal and institutional capacity in this group. The dismantling of the
United Nations-backed Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (Comisión
Internacional Contra la Impunidad en Guatemala – CICIG) — which had
strengthened local prosecutors’ investigative abilities and helped send
powerful businessmen, organized crime figures and politicians to jail — was a
major blow to anti-corruption efforts in the country. But Guatemalan
non-governmental and civil society organizations have kept attention on the
issue.
In the Dominican Republic, the public
understands the importance of anti-corruption reform. According to Transparency
International polls, the topic is a top priority for Dominicans across the
board and they have even taken to the streets to demand change in recent Plaza
de la Bandera protests. This does not make up, however, for the country’s weak
anti-corruption and investigative bodies, which have yet to resolve Odebrecht’s
alleged $92 million bribes scheme.
Paraguay ranks 12th on the Index due to
its large illicit economies, including money laundering, contraband and drug
trafficking, which exacerbate the problems of weak institutions. According to
the report, the infiltration of drug cartels into every sphere of government
makes the prospect of improvement unlikely in the foreseeable future. The
index highlights the expansion of Brazilian gangs, most notably the First
Capital Command (PCC), into the country as another serious concern.
5. The Outlier: Venezuela
Venezuela’s last place on the Index comes
as no surprise. The authors note that the country’s score has dropped another
11 percent from last year, as President Nicolás Maduro has further eroded
government institutions to the point that there are no truly independent bodies
left. In one flagrant example, a May ruling by the Supreme Court of Justice
officially made deputy Luis Parra, an ally of President Maduro, the new
president of the National Assembly. He replaced opposition leader Juan Guaidó
who was ousted after a disputed vote in January that the opposition called
illegitimate. The congressional body had previously lost most of its powers in
2017, when Maduro created a parallel legislature.
In this context of institutional decay,
Venezuelan civil society scored exceptionally well by comparison, thanks to the
“work of independent investigative journalists and NGOs that still operate in
the country.” Yet with no democratic and judicial institutions backing them,
civil society has little recourse.
U should do a article on encro mail bust.
ReplyDeleteQuestion. In the USA are politicians who take money from lobbyist, corporations etc in the form of donations and such, considered corruption? If so, would the USA rank high among most corrupt nations?
ReplyDeleteIf so...? A grand assumption.
DeleteNope.
DeleteIt's not corruption when deemed profitable for those in power. Its evident, "money over lives" is what this country has reverted to.
DeleteJust do nothing Mexico because the Americans might be worse, even though there is no proof of that.
DeleteSelf-reflection, not all blame should be externalized, give it a try!
Good article, BB. Good work.
ReplyDeleteNot true, if course. It always has been as bad as it possibly could be for all that time. It's just this route 3 of organisation, it takes them such a long time - by times, decades - to actually pick up on the very facts that already were obvious to everybody else all that time.
ReplyDelete